(4x73GB + 4x600GB)
Which means all the physical disks have 2.69 TB in total. But actual useful space is lower than that. It depends on how we design our storage to be in terms of high availability, fault tolerance, speed and performance.. I'll explain it now.. Above 8 hard disks can be combined in several ways to make logical hard disks. After all, the logical hard disks are the disks which can be seen by Operating Systems which are going to be installed later on this server. (Do not misunderstand this with partitions).
Those combining methods are called RAID levels and this combining is done through the RAID controller in the server. This server uses PERC 5/i as the Configuration Utility.
Understanding RAID Levels
RAID is the abbreviated term for Redundant Array of Independent Disks.
Basically what we do here is that we take several physical hard disks and group them to create logical hard disks. So we can choose which RAID level (combining method) to be used in our storage based on our requirements. Each type has advantages and disadvantages. Some methods are good for high availability while some are better for speed etc.
Following are the most common..
RAID level 0 -
No redundant / back up.. It only write data in 2 disks at the same time. Half of data in one disk and the other half in the other disk. If one disk become faulty you don't have a backup. All the array fails. Advantage is the speed..
RAID level 1 -
This method stores same data in 2 disks. So if one disk fails you have a back up. Disadvantage is you can use only half of your total disk space for your storage..
RAID level 5 - (Most Common Implementation, Better for Overall Performance)
You need to have 3 or more disks for this method. Data is not duplicated, works like level 0 RAID but it uses a parity for data recovery in a case of a hard disk failure. So this method is fast and reliable while you can use 3/4 of your total disk space to store data. Using a Hot Spare drive (dedicated drive to act as a recovery disk in a case of a disk failure) will be a good option with this level of RAID. The size of the Hot Spare disk must be at least equal to the largest physical disk in the array..
RAID level 10 -
Combination of RAID 1 and RAID 0. Again has a disadvantage of loosing a half of total disk space..
How I Planned..
I am chose RAID level 5 because the availability matters for me. The thing is I could create a one logical hard disk by combining all 8 physical disks. but because there are 2 sizes of hard disks with me, it will not be a good solution. Because they don't work well just like that if the sizes are different. I really tried to do that once but the maximum logical hard disk I could create was about 450 GB in size with RAID level 5.
So to get maximum out of the drives I have with high availability, I designed it to be like this..
So as you can see, I am going to create 2 logical disks because I have 2 types in sizes.
Logical disk 1 will contain three 73 GB hard disks with a one 73 GB Hot Spare disk..
Logical disk 2 will contain three 600 GB hard disks with a one 600 GB Hot Spare disk..
Configuring RAID Controller
(click on the images to view in full size)
Highlighted the Controller 0 by arrow keys and delete Foreign Configurations (disks configured for other outside systems) if there are any..
Again highlighted the Controller 0 and selected Create New VD..
VD stands for Virtual Disk.. (Logical Disk)
Also selected to configure Hot Spare.
Hit Ok..
Now it asked which disk to be the Hot Spare. I selected the remaining 73 GB one and Hit Ok..
Total size for VD-02 is like about 1.14 TB..
Selected the remaining 600 GB disk to be the Hot Spare for the VD-02.
Now the setup is configured but had to wait a long time till the controller initialize the virtual disks..
After the 1st one is initialized, it will go to the 2nd one..
After the initialization is completed, hit Escape and it asked to hit Alt + Ctrl + Del to restart the system.
You can see the logical disks I created in the final capture as it appeared during an OS installation..
Now it's like 2 hard disks of 145.5 GB and 1.2 TB..
I all the time used to read post in news papers but now as I am
ReplyDeletea user of net so from now I am using net for posts, thanks to web.
Thanks for another informative blog. Where else could I am getting that kind of info written in such
ReplyDeletea perfect approach? I've a project that I am just now operating on, and I have been on the look
out for such info.
I would like to say thank you for your post. I am a cyber security student, and purchased a used 2970 with the intention of using it for a network virtualization server. I had some issues using your guide for the eve-ng, after I recieved errors when I needed to enable nested vt. I noticed your BIOS version in the screen shot is 4.2.1. You stated you have opteron 2200's. The 2200 highest BIOS version is 3.0.3, BIOS version 4.2.1 is for the 4 and 6 core 2300 and 2400 cpu's. Can you confirm that in fact you are using AMD dual core 2200 cpu's please. I may try to upgrade bios to 4.2.1 outside Dell's statement, if I can confirm from you it works. That may fix my nested vt error. I just figured nested vt was too much on my system, but was paradoxical because it should not be nested vt in the first place. The only virtualization layer is using the eve-ng framework which is why I chose the bare metal install to begin with!
ReplyDeleteYes, I am using 2 x Dual-Core AMD Opteron™ 2222SE with the bios version u saw on screenshot, which does not support nested vt..
ReplyDeleteYou can certainly see your expertise within the article you write.
ReplyDeleteThe arena hopes for more passionate writers such
as you who are not afraid to say how they believe. Always go after your heart.